A file photo from 2022 shows French President Emmanuel Macron and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas smiling as they arrive for a joint press conference in Paris.


The keys

nuevo
Generated with AI

Tony Blair has been excluded as a candidate to lead the Peace Council proposed by Trump for the transition in Gaza, due to opposition from Arab and Muslim countries.

The main reason for his rejection is Blair’s support for the invasion of Iraq in 2003, which has generated strong distrust between Arab and Muslim governments.

Although Blair will not head the Peace Council, he is expected to serve on the Executive Committee, alongside figures such as Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff.

Blair’s legacy in the Middle East is considered controversial and ineffective, especially due to his closeness to US and Israeli interests and the lack of progress for the Palestinians during his tenure as international envoy.

The former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Tony Blairhas been excluded from the list of candidates to lead the Peace Council proposed by Donald Trump to lead the transition in the Gaza Strip if there is a ceasefire.

The reason is none other than the frontal opposition of Arab and Muslim governments, who have rejected his election because of his support for the invasion of Iraq led by the United States in 2003, according to sources cited by Financial Times.

In fact, it is worth remembering that Blair aligned himself with then-US president, George Bushand his Iraq war, and for many is considered a “war criminal”, although not by international justice institutions.

This invasion even led him to resign as prime minister in 2007 due to the collapse of his popularity.

Furthermore, to his exclusion from this Peace Council we must add the growing concern about the marginalization of Palestinians within the governance structure for the future Gaza.

Blair has so far been the only name Trump has endorsed to lead and coordinate his 20-point plan to end the war between Israel and Hamas by the end of September.

In fact, the president of the United States even described him as “very good man”while the express premier qualified this proposal, as well as his election to lead the Gaza International Transitional Authority (GITA), as a “bold and intelligent” proposal, publicly expressing their willingness to be part of this organization.

Two and a half months later, his name has been excluded, although in October Trump gave signs that this could happen. “I’ve always liked Tony, but I want to make sure he’s someone everyone accepts,” she said.

Now, The Arab and Muslim world vetoes Blair for being a controversial figure.

A controversial legacy

In fact, his legacy in Middle East leaves a lot to be desired. Two decades after being appointed envoy of the Quartet, a group made up of the US, Russia, the UN and the EU to materialize a “two state solution“between Palestine and Israel, its successes have hardly had any significance or have even been non-existent.

His work, which lasted for eight years until 2015has not brought about any substantial improvement in the lives of Palestinians, and Israel has, in fact, continued to expand illegal settlements in the West Bank.

For this reason, the figure of Tony Blair is perceived by a large majority as excessively close to the interests of Israel and the United States.

Despite this, according to the British media, although he will not be part of Trump’s Peace Council, Blair is expected to join the Executive Committee that will accompany the organism.

This committee will include Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushnerto the advisor to the Republican president, Steve Witkoff, and senior officials from Arab and Western countries.

The Executive Committee will have the task of coordinating the work between the Peace Council and a palestinian technocratic committee in charge of managing daily affairs in Gaza.

This connection between Blair and Kushner is by no means new. In 2019, the British supported the plan Jared Kushner to invest up to $50 billion to “modernize” Palestine.

At that time he noted that the project would be of “enormous benefit” to the Palestinians, although the Palestinian Authority described it as unviable by converting a political conflict into a mere real estate exercise.

Years later, this link is still active and is considered a “foreign guardianship” over Palestine by Arab and Muslim countries.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *